AI=Created Art Isn't Copyrightable, Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Studios Pause - The Hollywood Reporter

 As Panzer was tootling around in the Catosphere today, the Panzermobile was shaken by clapping coming from outside. Following all the hoopla, took our little kitty pilot to The Hollywood Reporter site. There he found a post about AI-generated artwork and copyright.

 

I can't copyright my books. I'm a cat.

According to Winston Cho's post, a federal judge ruled that AI-created artwork can't be granted a copyright. The judge's reasoning is based on the fact a copyright can only be granted to human created artwork. The lawsuit was before the judge because the U.S. Copyright Office refused to grant a copyright for a piece of artwork generated by an AI not a human.

 

 Panzer says, "If it's true for AI-generated artwork, it's true for AI-generated books. No copyright for either."

Note: This is a long-medium length post. Bring a glass of lemonade and a chocolate chip cookie (biscuit) for today's reading selection.

 

To read the post tootle over to AI generated works